Since reading Practical Cache Poisoning by James Kettle, testing the misconfiguration of web caching layers for cache poisoning and other related vulnerabilities has become a standard go-to of mine when spending time on bug bounties or other pentesting activities. Recently, while doing some bounty work, I came across a potential impact of cache poisoning I hadn't seen before - one that left the Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) mechanism in browsers vulnerable to being abused by an attacker that could lead to a Denial of Service of the website being attacked. Unfortunately the asset in question was out of scope for the owner's bounty program because the site was hosted by a Wordpress-as-a-service provider, however it turns out this issue was more widespread than just the site I found it on, and possibly extended to many more websites hosted by the provider.
This condensed request is not very special - we're just requesting a WP-JSON API resource with a
Origin value of
https://foo.bar, which is just a dummy value to serve as an example of a different origin compared to the Wordpress site being requested. What does the response look like?
This is where things get a bit more interesting. As shown, our
Origin value is now being reflected back in the
Access-Control-Allow-Origin response header, which is the header that instructs browser on whether the requesting origin is allowed to read the response. Given it is unlikely that
https://foo.bar is specifically being white listed, it is safe to assume this means the response is just echoing back whatever
Origin value is in the request. This echoing back is a rather common practice by web devs when trying to open up a resource to all origins, however it is not a good idea to do so without careful consideration, and in this case it will prove key to being able to abuse the CORS system.
Other than the fact this echoing-back can be dangerous when the
Access-Control-Allow-Credentials header is also being returned as
true as outlined in my other CORS related post (although it appears WP-JSON may not be vulnerable due to requiring a valid nonce on all authenticated requests), this response hints at another problem - namely, the
Cache-Control: max-age=600, must-revalidate in the response hints at the fact that this is a cacheable response. If there was some sort of intermediate web cache involved in this request, it may just cache it and serve future requests for this resource from cache. What happens if we request the same resource again, but this time change the
Origin value in the request?
And the response:
We can see the response was indeed likely served from cache, as indicated by the
X-Cache: HIT: 1 response header. This is where we can see the cache poisoning take effect. Despite the fact the
Origin value was changed in the request, the response continues to only allow
https://foo.bar read access to this resource in a CORS context. This is a classic case of cache poisoning as a result of something in the request being used in the response, but not being used in the cache key.
If by some chance the frontend of the app in question happens to sit in a different origin than the Wordpress site (e.g.
www.site.com for the frontend and
api.site.com for the Wordpress instance), then the frontend would require CORS to be configured to allow it access to WP-JSON API, and this cache poisoning vulnerability could impact the availability of such an app, as the mismatch between a legitimate
Origin value in a request compared to the attacker's poisoned
Access-Control-Allow-Origin value in the response will result in an error like the following in a browser console:
This request should have worked, because we've already demonstrated that the backend if just echoing back the
Origin in the
Access-Control-Allow-Origin header, but what actually happened is this response was served from cache and the
Access-Control-Allow-Origin value was poisoned by an earlier request. This of course would be the same if the Wordpress site wasn't being used in a headless config, but rather had other services on other origins that required access to the WP-JSON API, such as for content sharing purposes. Basically, this cache poisoning would affect any situation where WP-JSON and CORS are needed.
After reporting the issue, the Wordpress SaaS provider recently applied a fix that prevents requests with an
Origin header from being served from cache.